Processing math: 100%
Skip to main content

Gauss-Lucas Theorem

 Theorem: If all zeros of a polynomial P(z) lie in a half-plane, then all zeros pf the derivative P(z) lie in the same half-plane.

Proof: Let P(z) be any polynomial with degree n. Then P(z)=a(za1)(za2)(zan)

where a1,a2,,an are the zeros of P(z). Hence P(z)P(z)=1za1+1za2++1zan
Suppose the half plane H defined as the part of the plane where IMzab<0
. Suppose z If ak is in H and z is no, we have then Imzakb=ImzabImakab>0
But the imaginary parts of reciprocal numbers have opposite signs. Therefore, under the same assumption, Im b(zak)1<0.Now  this is true for all k we conclude that ImbP(z)P(z)=nk=1Imbzak<0
and consequently P(z)0. Hence z is not a root of P(z) concluding that all roots of P(z) lie in H.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hierarchy Theorems (Time, Space, Alternation)

There are many hierarchy theorems based on Time, Space, Nondeterminism, Randomization etc. Time Hierarchy Theorem (Version 1) : If f,g are time-constructible functions satisfying f(n)logf(n)=o(g(n)), then DTIME(f(n))DTIME(g(n))
Proof:  Consider the following Turing machine D: "On input x, run for f(|x|)log(f(|x|)) steps the Universal TM U to simulate the execution of Mx on x. If U outputs some bit b{0,1} in this time, then output the opposite answer (i.e., output 1b ). Else output 0.” Here Mx is the machine represented by the string x.      By definition, D halts within f(n)log(f(n)) steps and hence the language L decided by D is in DTIME(g(n)). Claim:  L DTIME (f(n)) Proof:  For contradiction's sake, assume that there is some TM M and constant c such that TM M, given any input x{0,1}, halts within cf(|x|) steps and outputs D(x)....

Cook - Levin Theorem

Around 1971, Cook and Levin independently discovered the notion of NPcompleteness and gave examples of combinatorial NPcomplete problems whose definition seems to have nothing to do with Turing machines. Soon after, Karp showed that NPcompleteness occurs widely and many problems of practical interest are NPcomplete. To date, thousands of computational problems in a variety of disciplines have been shown to be NPcomplete. SAT is the language of all satisfiable CNF formulae. Cook-Levin Theorem : SAT is NPcomplete Before we go into the proof first we need to define some things Configuration of a Turing Machine: A configuration of a Turing Machine at any point of time t is basically the snapshot of the turning machine at that time. It is an ordered pair of the head position, current state, and tape content. Any configuration is initialized and ended with a special symbol, let # mark its ending. Then the contents of the tape at the left of ...

Function Automata: A Technique to Solve Finite State Automata Problems

Here I will describe a strategy or technique to solve some finite state automata problems. This strategy was first taught to us by my Theory of Computation Professor. The term 'Function Automata' is given to me since we use function-like structures in this.     Suppose you are given a language that is a regular set L. So there exists a DFA for L, LD=(Q,Σ,δ,q1,F) where Q is the set of states, Σ is the set of alphabets, δ is the transition function, S is the starting state and f is the set of final states. Now let Q={q1,q2,,qn where nN. Now we will do a kind of subset construction but every new state will have n states of Q but they can repeat. So (q1,q1,,q1n times)
is a state of the new automata. Now, what is the meaning of these new states? Let f=(qk1,qk2,,qkn) be a new state where qki's are not necessary to be diff...